← Back to Insights

Civic Desert Index

Where civic
stock runs thin

CIRCLE's 2017 study coined the term "civic desert" — places without youth programming, arts orgs, or active religious congregations — and found 60% of rural millennials live in one. We translated that framing into a county-level score: youth-relevant 501(c) entities per under-25 resident. Click any county for its full nonprofit list and demographic profile.

U.S. under-25s in Civic Desert counties

21.6%

Youth in counties scoring in the bottom quintile by youth-relevant orgs per under-25 resident.

U.S. under-25s in Double-Desert counties

2.7%

246 counties bottom-quintile on both count and capacity (revenue per youth). The actually-actionable list.

Rural youth in Civic Deserts

21.4%

CIRCLE's 2017 survey put this at 60% based on self-reported access. Registry-based density is lower — see methodology.

Urban youth in Civic Deserts

21.6%

Within ~1pp of the rural rate. Rurality alone doesn't predict desert status — composition does.

Geographic distribution

Civic Desert map

Legend

Civic Desert tier (count-based score quintile)

  • Civic Desert
  • Civic Thin
  • Mid
  • Civic Solid
  • Civic Rich
  • No data / not scored

Counties bottom-quintile on both count and capacity ("Double-Desert") get a heavier outline. Hover for score and tier; click any county to open its spotlight. On a phone, tap once for the numbers and again to open it.

Tier mix by USDA Rural-Urban Continuum Code

The desert is in the middle

RUCC 1
18%in desert
RUCC 2
30%in desert
RUCC 3
27%in desert
RUCC 4
23%in desert
RUCC 5
33%in desert
RUCC 6
21%in desert
RUCC 7
20%in desert
RUCC 8
17%in desert
RUCC 9
16%in desert
Civic Desert
Civic Thin
Mid
Civic Solid
Civic Rich

Each bar is the share of under-25 residents in that RUCC class living in counties of each tier. Mid-metros (RUCC 2) and standalone nonmetro counties without metro adjacency (RUCC 5) show the highest concentration of youth in Civic Desert counties — not the most rural areas. Deep rural counties (RUCC 8–9) score better than the largest metros (RUCC 1).

Showing 3,113 of 3,113 counties.

#TierRUCC
1Peñuelas Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert0.00—0
5,81820,3992
2Guayama Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert0.20—2
2 zombies cut
9,85736,6143
3Yabucoa Municipio, PRCivic Desert0.27$2k2
2 filing 990
7,43430,4261
4Villalba Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert0.32$752
2 filing 990
6,19622,0932
5Juncos Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert0.39$2024
2 filing 990 · 2 zombies cut
10,35037,0121
6Comerío Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert0.40—2
4,95318,8831
7Guayanilla Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert0.43$212
2 filing 990 · 2 zombies cut
4,67717,7842
8Morovis Municipio, PRCivic Desert0.51$2k4
2 filing 990
7,78728,7271
9Vega Baja Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert0.58$9268
4 filing 990 · 2 zombies cut
13,87554,4141
10Juana Díaz Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert0.62—8
2 zombies cut
12,86846,5382
11San Lorenzo Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert0.64$1496
4 filing 990
9,41237,6931
12Las Piedras Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert0.66—6
9,13935,1801
13Toa Alta Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert0.67$712
2 filing 990 · 4 zombies cut
18,02866,8521
14Santa Isabel Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert0.70—4
5,69420,2816
15Coamo Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert0.72$1726
4 filing 990
8,38734,6684
16Cayey Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert0.78$518
4 filing 990 · 2 zombies cut
10,32141,6521
17Maunabo Municipio, PRCivic Desert0.80$12k2
2 filing 990
2,49510,5891
18Corozal Municipio, PRCivic Desert0.85$5k8
2 filing 990
9,44334,5711
19Salinas Municipio, PRCivic Desert0.86$3k6
4 filing 990
6,98425,7894
20Toa Baja Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert0.93$6118
4 filing 990 · 2 zombies cut
19,30975,2931
21Arecibo Municipio, PRCivic Desert0.99$2k22
12 filing 990 · 2 zombies cut
22,14287,7543
22Naranjito Municipio, PRCivic Desert1.04$33k8
6 filing 990
7,70129,2411
23Lajas Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert1.08—6
5,54723,3343
24Carolina Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert1.09$75142
10 filing 990 · 12 zombies cut
38,454154,8151
25Guánica Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert1.10$4414
2 filing 990 · 2 zombies cut
3,63913,7876
26Starr County, TXDoubleCivic Desert1.13$17033
10 filing 990 · 2 zombies cut
29,09465,9204
27Utuado Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert1.14$1148
4 filing 990 · 2 zombies cut
7,02428,2876
28Trujillo Alto Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert1.16$8720
2 filing 990 · 2 zombies cut
17,29767,7401
29Camuy Municipio, PRCivic Desert1.22$16k10
6 filing 990
8,18532,8273
30San Sebastián Municipio, PRCivic Desert1.23$1k12
2 filing 990
9,78839,3452
31Vega Alta Municipio, PRCivic Desert1.23$2k12
10 filing 990 · 4 zombies cut
9,73435,3951
32Aguas Buenas Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert1.30$2578
2 filing 990
6,17524,2231
33Aibonito Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert1.33$3478
4 filing 990 · 2 zombies cut
6,01324,6371
34Cataño Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert1.33$418
2 filing 990
5,99723,1551
35Mayagüez Municipio, PRCivic Desert1.33$4k30
16 filing 990 · 8 zombies cut
22,52273,0773
36Barceloneta Municipio, PRCivic Desert1.34$12k8
4 filing 990
5,97322,6571
37Río Grande Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert1.36$13416
4 filing 990 · 2 zombies cut
11,78347,0601
38Arroyo Municipio, PRCivic Desert1.40$16k6
2 filing 990
4,27715,8433
39Ciales Municipio, PRCivic Desert1.40$16k6
4 filing 990
4,27216,9841
40Barranquitas Municipio, PRCivic Desert1.41$7k12
4 filing 990
8,49728,9831
41Jayuya Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert1.44—6
4,16214,7796
42Ceiba Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert1.47$3514
2 filing 990 · 2 zombies cut
2,71711,3071
43Maverick County, TXCivic Desert1.51$2k37
10 filing 990 · 7 zombies cut
24,42457,8873
44Zapata County, TXDoubleCivic Desert1.52$1759
2 filing 990 · 2 zombies cut
5,91113,8896
45Aguadilla Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert1.55$24922
4 filing 990 · 2 zombies cut
14,22155,1012
46Moca Municipio, PRCivic Desert1.58$8k16
12 filing 990 · 2 zombies cut
10,13837,4602
47Canóvanas Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert1.60$21018
6 filing 990 · 2 zombies cut
11,28042,3371
48Maricao Municipio, PRDoubleCivic Desert1.61—2
1,2404,7558
49Patillas Municipio, PRCivic Desert1.61$20k6
4 filing 990
3,72615,9853
50Webster County, GADoubleCivic Desert1.62$1811
1 filing 990
6192,3488

Page 1 of 63 — showing 1–50 of 3,113

Methodology. The Civic Desert count score = (count of youth-relevant 501(c) entities) ÷ (under-25 population) × 1,000. The Civic Desert capacity score = (sum of those orgs' reported revenue) ÷ (under-25 population), reported in dollars per youth. "Youth-relevant" counts orgs in NTEE major categories O (Youth Development), A (Arts/Culture/Humanities), B (Education), and N (Recreation/Sports), plus any org with IRS classification code beginning "1000" (church / religious congregation). Two exclusions apply throughout: (1) registered-agent address clusters (≥25 orgs at one address — e.g. Foundation Source in Wilmington DE) are stripped; (2) zombie organizations are stripped — defined as orgs with no Form 990 filing since Jan 2021 AND no reported revenue or assets, where the org isn't a church or religious-exempt non-filer. About 18.6% of all BMF orgs are zombies; only 2–4% of youth-relevant orgs are (because most youth-relevant orgs are churches, which structurally never zombie out under this rule). Source: IRS Exempt Organizations BMF + ACS 5-year (2023) Subject Table S0101 + USDA RUCC 2023.

Why two scores. Count alone treats a $0 paper-filing 501(c) the same as a fully-staffed Boys & Girls Club. Capacity reweights to financial scale. But capacity has its own blind spot: churches are exempt from Form 990 filing entirely, so every classification=1000 entity reports $0 revenue regardless of actual budget — meaning rural counties whose civic stock is church-heavy will look low on capacity even when the churches are large and active. Similarly, 501(c)s with annual gross receipts under $50k file the 990-N postcard which doesn't report revenue. About 29% of all orgs and 34% of youth-relevant orgs report a non-zero revenue figure to the IRS. Double-Desert counties — bottom quintile on both scores — are the subset where neither blind spot saves them: few orgs, and the ones that exist are tiny.

Tiering. Counties are ranked by score and split into quintiles: bottom 20% = Civic Desert, next 20% = Civic Thin, middle = Mid, then Civic Solid and Civic Rich. Counties with under-25 pop < 500 are excluded as denominator-noise; Connecticut planning regions are excluded because the IRS join still uses the pre-2022 county FIPS.

Difference from CIRCLE. CIRCLE's 2017 survey of 1,000 millennials found 60% of rural youth in "civic deserts" based on self-reported access to civic resources. Our number — counties only, not individuals — sits much lower because IRS registration lists every active 501(c) regardless of operational vigor or distance to the youth who could actually use it. A registered VFW post 30 minutes from a 17-year-old without a car still counts here; in the CIRCLE framework, it doesn't. Use this index to find counties where civic stock is thin per youth, not as a measurement of lived civic experience.